Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MADISON STATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MADISON STATE HOSPITAL
CCN 154019 | IN | 150 beds | Current EBITDA $500K → Pro Forma $838K (+$339K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$500K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$339K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$838K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+543bps
Margin Improvement
$239K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$339K
Modeled Uplift
$234K
Risk-Adjusted
-$104K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$128K
+206bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$125K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$76K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+15bp
Total EBITDA Impact$339K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$120K$8K$128K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$125K$125K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$19K$57K$76K$239K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$32K$64K$96K$128K$128K$128K$128K
Cost to Collect$0$31K$62K$94K$125K$125K$125K$125K
A/R Days Reduction$0$25K$51K$76K$76K$76K$76K$76K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$93K$187K$276K$339K$339K$339K$339K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $339K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$500K$500K8.0%
Year 1$515K+$226K$740K11.9%
Year 2$530K+$339K$869K13.9%
Year 3$546K+$339K$885K14.2%
Year 4$562K+$339K$901K14.4%
Year 5$579K+$339K$918K14.7%
$5.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$10.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.1M
Value Created
$918K
Exit EBITDA
$796K
Organic Growth
$3.4M
RCM Value Creation
$918K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$64K$96K$128K$154K
Cost to Collect$62K$94K$125K$150K
A/R Days Reduction$38K$57K$76K$91K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$169K$254K$339K$407K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-9.8%5.5%16.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross8.2%23.6%27.7%34.9%
P4
Occupancy68.3%47.8%57.1%67.0%
P77
Rev/Bed$42K$726K$1.6M$2.0M
P4
Exp/Bed$214K$638K$1.5M$1.9M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML