Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INDIANAPOLIS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INDIANAPOLIS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 153048 | IN | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$893K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$893K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$651K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$893K
Modeled Uplift
$619K
Risk-Adjusted
-$274K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$339K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$336K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$207K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$893K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$339K$339K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$327K$9K$336K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$52K$154K$207K$651K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$85K$170K$255K$339K$339K$339K$339K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$84K$168K$252K$336K$336K$336K$336K
A/R Days Reduction$0$69K$138K$207K$207K$207K$207K$207K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$243K$486K$724K$893K$893K$893K$893K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $893K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.3x
9.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
10.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M7.1%
Year 1$1.2M+$595K$1.8M10.8%
Year 2$1.3M+$893K$2.2M12.8%
Year 3$1.3M+$893K$2.2M13.0%
Year 4$1.4M+$893K$2.3M13.3%
Year 5$1.4M+$893K$2.3M13.5%
$12.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$25.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.1M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$8.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$170K$255K$339K$407K
Denial Rate Reductio$168K$252K$336K$403K
A/R Days Reduction$103K$155K$207K$248K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$446K$670K$893K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.1%-11.7%-2.9%7.5%
P71
Net-to-Gross53.8%27.6%32.3%39.9%
P87
Occupancy63.9%25.8%42.1%61.5%
P77
Rev/Bed$424K$427K$1.3M$2.0M
P24
Exp/Bed$394K$429K$1.4M$2.0M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML