Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM REHAB HOSP OF GREATER INDIANA 2026-04-26 17:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM REHAB HOSP OF GREATER INDIANA
CCN 153046 | IN | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $3.7M → Pro Forma $5.0M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$931K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$963K
Risk-Adjusted
-$315K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$485K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$481K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$295K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$485K$485K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$467K$13K$481K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$74K$221K$295K$931K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$121K$243K$364K$485K$485K$485K$485K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$120K$240K$360K$481K$481K$481K$481K
A/R Days Reduction$0$98K$197K$295K$295K$295K$295K$295K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$348K$696K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.7M$3.7M15.3%
Year 1$3.8M+$851K$4.7M19.3%
Year 2$3.9M+$1.3M$5.2M21.5%
Year 3$4.1M+$1.3M$5.3M22.0%
Year 4$4.2M+$1.3M$5.5M22.5%
Year 5$4.3M+$1.3M$5.6M23.0%
$37.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$61.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.3M
Value Created
$5.6M
Exit EBITDA
$5.9M
Organic Growth
$12.8M
RCM Value Creation
$5.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$243K$364K$485K$583K
Denial Rate Reductio$240K$360K$481K$577K
A/R Days Reduction$148K$222K$295K$354K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$639K$958K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 92 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.3%-11.7%-2.0%8.5%
P81
Net-to-Gross56.4%27.7%32.3%40.4%
P93
Occupancy87.5%26.0%42.2%61.1%
P97
Rev/Bed$578K$416K$1.3M$2.0M
P32
Exp/Bed$489K$420K$1.3M$1.9M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML