Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK REHAB HOSP 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK REHAB HOSP
CCN 153043 | IN | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $13.3M → Pro Forma $15.4M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$547K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$787K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$779K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$479K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$787K$787K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$757K$22K$779K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$121K$358K$479K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$197K$393K$590K$787K$787K$787K$787K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$195K$390K$584K$779K$779K$779K$779K
A/R Days Reduction$0$160K$319K$479K$479K$479K$479K$479K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$564K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.3M$13.3M33.9%
Year 1$13.7M+$1.4M$15.1M38.4%
Year 2$14.2M+$2.1M$16.2M41.2%
Year 3$14.6M+$2.1M$16.6M42.3%
Year 4$15.0M+$2.1M$17.1M43.4%
Year 5$15.5M+$2.1M$17.5M44.6%
$133.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$192.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$59.5M
Value Created
$17.5M
Exit EBITDA
$21.2M
Organic Growth
$20.7M
RCM Value Creation
$17.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$393K$590K$787K$944K
Denial Rate Reductio$390K$584K$779K$935K
A/R Days Reduction$239K$359K$479K$575K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin33.9%-11.7%1.2%14.5%
P97
Net-to-Gross54.2%26.1%32.0%41.4%
P81
Occupancy86.0%36.4%52.4%68.5%
P92
Rev/Bed$656K$354K$787K$2.0M
P47
Exp/Bed$433K$326K$767K$1.9M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML