Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF FT WAYNE 2026-04-26 11:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF FT WAYNE
CCN 153030 | IN | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $3.7M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$776K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$805K
Risk-Adjusted
-$258K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$404K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$400K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$246K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$404K$404K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$389K$11K$400K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$62K$184K$246K$776K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$101K$202K$303K$404K$404K$404K$404K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$100K$200K$300K$400K$400K$400K$400K
A/R Days Reduction$0$82K$164K$246K$246K$246K$246K$246K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$290K$579K$863K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
10.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M13.1%
Year 1$2.7M+$709K$3.4M17.0%
Year 2$2.8M+$1.1M$3.9M19.2%
Year 3$2.9M+$1.1M$4.0M19.6%
Year 4$3.0M+$1.1M$4.1M20.1%
Year 5$3.1M+$1.1M$4.1M20.5%
$26.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$45.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.0M
Value Created
$4.1M
Exit EBITDA
$4.2M
Organic Growth
$10.6M
RCM Value Creation
$4.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$202K$303K$404K$485K
Denial Rate Reductio$200K$300K$400K$480K
A/R Days Reduction$123K$185K$246K$295K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$16K
Total$532K$798K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.1%-11.9%-2.9%7.0%
P83
Net-to-Gross27.5%28.5%32.0%38.9%
P23
Occupancy94.0%24.7%39.2%59.4%
P99
Rev/Bed$562K$433K$1.3M$2.0M
P28
Exp/Bed$488K$430K$1.3M$2.0M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML