Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - EVANSVILLE LLC. 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - EVANSVILLE LLC.
CCN 152014 | IN | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.7M → Pro Forma $-5.6M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$837K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$796K
Risk-Adjusted
-$352K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$436K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$432K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$265K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$436K$436K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$420K$12K$432K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$67K$199K$265K$837K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$109K$218K$327K$436K$436K$436K$436K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$108K$216K$324K$432K$432K$432K$432K
A/R Days Reduction$0$88K$177K$265K$265K$265K$265K$265K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$313K$625K$931K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.7M$-6.7M-30.8%
Year 1$-6.9M+$765K$-6.2M-28.2%
Year 2$-7.1M+$1.1M$-6.0M-27.4%
Year 3$-7.3M+$1.1M$-6.2M-28.4%
Year 4$-7.6M+$1.1M$-6.4M-29.4%
Year 5$-7.8M+$1.1M$-6.6M-30.4%
$-67.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-73.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-5.9M
Value Created
$-6.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.7M
Organic Growth
$11.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$218K$327K$436K$524K
Denial Rate Reductio$216K$324K$432K$518K
A/R Days Reduction$133K$199K$265K$319K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$17K
Total$574K$861K$1.1M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-30.8%-11.7%1.2%14.5%
P4
Net-to-Gross17.1%26.1%32.0%41.4%
P4
Occupancy62.5%36.4%52.4%68.5%
P64
Rev/Bed$364K$354K$787K$2.0M
P26
Exp/Bed$476K$326K$767K$1.9M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML