Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENT WARRICK 2026-04-27 03:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENT WARRICK
CCN 151325 | IN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.0M → Pro Forma $-1.1M (+$968K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 151325

ASCENSION ST. VINCENT WARRICK
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$18.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$968K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$706K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$968K
Modeled Uplift
$585K
Risk-Adjusted
-$383K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$368K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$364K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$224K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$968K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$368K$368K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$354K$10K$364K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$167K$224K$706K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$92K$184K$276K$368K$368K$368K$368K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$91K$182K$273K$364K$364K$364K$364K
A/R Days Reduction$0$75K$149K$224K$224K$224K$224K$224K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$264K$527K$785K$968K$968K$968K$968K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $968K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.0M$-2.0M-11.0%
Year 1$-2.1M+$645K$-1.4M-7.8%
Year 2$-2.2M+$968K$-1.2M-6.4%
Year 3$-2.2M+$968K$-1.2M-6.8%
Year 4$-2.3M+$968K$-1.3M-7.1%
Year 5$-2.4M+$968K$-1.4M-7.5%
$-20.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-15.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.1M
Value Created
$-1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.2M
Organic Growth
$9.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$184K$276K$368K$442K
Denial Rate Reductio$182K$273K$364K$437K
A/R Days Reduction$112K$168K$224K$269K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$484K$726K$968K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.0%-14.7%-5.2%6.8%
P36
Net-to-Gross29.9%29.6%33.4%47.9%
P28
Occupancy18.6%25.9%36.4%58.2%
P14
Rev/Bed$736K$620K$1.4M$2.0M
P28
Exp/Bed$817K$726K$1.6M$2.6M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML