Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DUKES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 05:14 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DUKES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 151318 | IN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $3.0M → Pro Forma $5.3M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 151318

DUKES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$43.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$689K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$870K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$861K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$529K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$870K$870K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$837K$24K$861K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$133K$396K$529K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$217K$435K$652K$870K$870K$870K$870K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$215K$431K$646K$861K$861K$861K$861K
A/R Days Reduction$0$176K$353K$529K$529K$529K$529K$529K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$623K$1.2M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.5x
9.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.4x
10.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
11.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
12.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.0M$3.0M6.9%
Year 1$3.1M+$1.5M$4.6M10.6%
Year 2$3.2M+$2.3M$5.5M12.5%
Year 3$3.3M+$2.3M$5.5M12.7%
Year 4$3.4M+$2.3M$5.6M13.0%
Year 5$3.5M+$2.3M$5.7M13.2%
$29.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$63.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.4M
Value Created
$5.7M
Exit EBITDA
$4.7M
Organic Growth
$22.9M
RCM Value Creation
$5.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$435K$652K$870K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$431K$646K$861K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$265K$397K$529K$635K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.9%-14.7%-5.2%6.8%
P74
Net-to-Gross23.5%29.6%33.4%47.9%
P7
Occupancy55.1%25.9%36.4%58.2%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.7M$620K$1.4M$2.0M
P60
Exp/Bed$1.6M$726K$1.6M$2.6M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML