Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GREENE COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 02:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GREENE COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 151317 | IN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.3M → Pro Forma $-3.8M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 151317

GREENE COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$47.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$918K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$958K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$948K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$583K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$958K$958K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$922K$26K$948K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$147K$436K$583K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$239K$479K$718K$958K$958K$958K$958K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$237K$474K$711K$948K$948K$948K$948K
A/R Days Reduction$0$194K$389K$583K$583K$583K$583K$583K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$686K$1.4M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.3M$-6.3M-13.2%
Year 1$-6.5M+$1.7M$-4.8M-10.1%
Year 2$-6.7M+$2.5M$-4.2M-8.8%
Year 3$-6.9M+$2.5M$-4.4M-9.2%
Year 4$-7.1M+$2.5M$-4.6M-9.6%
Year 5$-7.3M+$2.5M$-4.8M-10.1%
$-63.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-53.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.3M
Value Created
$-4.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.1M
Organic Growth
$25.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$479K$718K$958K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$474K$711K$948K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$291K$437K$583K$699K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.2%-14.7%-5.2%6.8%
P28
Net-to-Gross33.7%29.6%33.4%47.9%
P52
Occupancy22.4%25.9%36.4%58.2%
P22
Rev/Bed$1.9M$620K$1.4M$2.0M
P69
Exp/Bed$2.2M$726K$1.6M$2.6M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML