Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST VINCENT SALEM 2026-04-27 02:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST VINCENT SALEM
CCN 151314 | IN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $556K → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$970K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 151314

ASCENSION ST VINCENT SALEM
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$18.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$556K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$970K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$707K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

57%
Realization (C)
$970K
Modeled Uplift
$554K
Risk-Adjusted
-$416K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 57% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$369K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$365K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$224K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$970K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$369K$369K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$355K$10K$365K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$57K$168K$224K$707K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$92K$184K$276K$369K$369K$369K$369K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$91K$182K$274K$365K$365K$365K$365K
A/R Days Reduction$0$75K$150K$224K$224K$224K$224K$224K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$264K$528K$786K$970K$970K$970K$970K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $970K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x78% / 18.0x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.7x89% / 23.9x90% / 25.1x
9.0x73% / 15.6x78% / 17.7x82% / 19.8x84% / 20.9x85% / 21.9x
10.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x
11.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.3x
12.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.4x
Headroom (turns)
53%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 53% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.1x, adding 5.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$556K$556K3.0%
Year 1$573K+$646K$1.2M6.6%
Year 2$590K+$970K$1.6M8.5%
Year 3$608K+$970K$1.6M8.6%
Year 4$626K+$970K$1.6M8.7%
Year 5$645K+$970K$1.6M8.8%
$5.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.2M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$886K
Organic Growth
$9.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$184K$276K$369K$442K
Denial Rate Reductio$182K$274K$365K$438K
A/R Days Reduction$112K$168K$224K$269K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$485K$727K$970K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.0%-14.7%-5.2%6.8%
P67
Net-to-Gross29.0%29.6%33.4%47.9%
P22
Occupancy2.7%25.9%36.4%58.2%
P0
Rev/Bed$737K$620K$1.4M$2.0M
P29
Exp/Bed$715K$726K$1.6M$2.6M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML