Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MONROE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MONROE HOSPITAL
CCN 150183 | IN | 32 beds | Current EBITDA $-21.5M → Pro Forma $-19.8M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-21.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-19.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$590K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$616K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$610K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$375K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$616K$616K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$593K$17K$610K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$94K$280K$375K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$154K$308K$462K$616K$616K$616K$616K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$152K$305K$457K$610K$610K$610K$610K
A/R Days Reduction$0$125K$250K$375K$375K$375K$375K$375K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$441K$882K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-21.5M$-21.5M-69.7%
Year 1$-22.1M+$1.1M$-21.0M-68.2%
Year 2$-22.8M+$1.6M$-21.1M-68.6%
Year 3$-23.4M+$1.6M$-21.8M-70.9%
Year 4$-24.1M+$1.6M$-22.5M-73.1%
Year 5$-24.9M+$1.6M$-23.2M-75.5%
$-214.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-255.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-41.2M
Value Created
$-23.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-34.2M
Organic Growth
$16.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-23.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$308K$462K$616K$739K
Denial Rate Reductio$305K$457K$610K$732K
A/R Days Reduction$187K$281K$375K$450K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$810K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-16.3%-5.2%6.3%
P0
Net-to-Gross21.6%29.0%33.0%47.9%
P7
Occupancy31.4%26.3%40.0%58.8%
P34
Rev/Bed$962K$548K$1.4M$2.0M
P40
Exp/Bed$1.6M$485K$1.5M$2.3M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML