Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENT FISHERS 2026-04-26 11:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENT FISHERS
CCN 150181 | IN | 46 beds | Current EBITDA $15.0M → Pro Forma $19.0M (+$4.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$75.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$4.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.5M (vs $4.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$921K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$48K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$42K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$232K$689K$921K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$48K$48K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$379K$757K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$375K$750K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$307K$614K$921K$921K$921K$921K$921K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.2M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.0M$15.0M19.8%
Year 1$15.5M+$2.7M$18.1M23.9%
Year 2$15.9M+$4.0M$19.9M26.3%
Year 3$16.4M+$4.0M$20.4M26.9%
Year 4$16.9M+$4.0M$20.9M27.6%
Year 5$17.4M+$4.0M$21.4M28.3%
$150.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$235.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$85.2M
Value Created
$21.4M
Exit EBITDA
$23.9M
Organic Growth
$39.8M
RCM Value Creation
$21.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$757K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$750K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$461K$691K$921K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$48K$58K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.8%-11.7%-1.7%9.0%
P85
Net-to-Gross30.2%27.5%32.3%39.1%
P39
Occupancy20.7%26.4%42.5%60.6%
P17
Rev/Bed$1.6M$419K$1.2M$2.0M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.3M$425K$1.2M$1.9M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML