Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF INDIANA INC. 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF INDIANA INC.
CCN 150169 | IN | 340 beds | Current EBITDA $67.6M → Pro Forma $97.4M (+$29.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$565.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$67.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$29.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$97.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$29.7M
Modeled Uplift
$20.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.9M (vs $29.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$362K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$29.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.3M$11.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.9M$311K$11.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.1M$6.9M$21.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$362K$362K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$181K$362K$362K$362K$362K$362K$362K
Cumulative$0$8.1M$16.2M$24.1M$29.7M$29.7M$29.7M$29.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $29.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$67.6M$67.6M12.0%
Year 1$69.7M+$19.8M$89.5M15.8%
Year 2$71.7M+$29.7M$101.5M18.0%
Year 3$73.9M+$29.7M$103.6M18.3%
Year 4$76.1M+$29.7M$105.8M18.7%
Year 5$78.4M+$29.7M$108.1M19.1%
$676.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.19B
Exit EV (11x)
$513.2M
Value Created
$108.1M
Exit EBITDA
$107.7M
Organic Growth
$297.3M
RCM Value Creation
$108.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.7M$8.5M$11.3M$13.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$13.4M
A/R Days Reduction$3.4M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M
Clean Claim Rate$181K$271K$362K$434K
Total$14.9M$22.3M$29.7M$35.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.0%-0.9%3.8%9.7%
P80
Net-to-Gross30.5%22.2%24.9%30.0%
P76
Occupancy74.7%61.0%69.0%72.8%
P84
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.6M$1.7M$2.1M
P44
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.5M$1.6M$2.1M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML