Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — IU HEALTH WEST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — IU HEALTH WEST HOSPITAL
CCN 150158 | IN | 174 beds | Current EBITDA $26.1M → Pro Forma $41.3M (+$15.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$288.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$41.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$15.2M
Modeled Uplift
$10.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.8M (vs $15.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$185K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.6M$159K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$886K$2.6M$3.5M$11.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$185K$185K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$92K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.3M$12.3M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
9.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
10.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
11.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26.1M$26.1M9.0%
Year 1$26.9M+$10.1M$37.0M12.8%
Year 2$27.7M+$15.2M$42.9M14.9%
Year 3$28.5M+$15.2M$43.7M15.1%
Year 4$29.4M+$15.2M$44.6M15.4%
Year 5$30.2M+$15.2M$45.4M15.7%
$260.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$499.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$238.9M
Value Created
$45.4M
Exit EBITDA
$41.6M
Organic Growth
$151.9M
RCM Value Creation
$45.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$92K$139K$185K$222K
Total$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.0%-11.7%4.1%14.2%
P62
Net-to-Gross22.2%22.9%27.1%31.4%
P23
Occupancy69.0%47.8%60.7%68.6%
P75
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
P46
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$1.6M$1.9M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML