Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENT HEART CENTER 2026-04-26 06:40 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. VINCENT HEART CENTER
CCN 150153 | IN | 107 beds | Current EBITDA $63.2M → Pro Forma $73.5M (+$10.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$195.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$63.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$73.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$10.3M
Modeled Uplift
$7.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.1M (vs $10.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$125K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.9M$3.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.8M$107K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$599K$1.8M$2.4M$7.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$125K$125K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$977K$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$967K$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$792K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$63K$125K$125K$125K$125K$125K$125K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x
11.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.6x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$63.2M$63.2M32.4%
Year 1$65.1M+$6.9M$71.9M36.8%
Year 2$67.1M+$10.3M$77.3M39.6%
Year 3$69.1M+$10.3M$79.3M40.6%
Year 4$71.1M+$10.3M$81.4M41.7%
Year 5$73.3M+$10.3M$83.5M42.8%
$632.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$919.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$287.0M
Value Created
$83.5M
Exit EBITDA
$100.7M
Organic Growth
$102.8M
RCM Value Creation
$83.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$63K$94K$125K$150K
Total$5.1M$7.7M$10.3M$12.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin32.4%-10.3%6.1%17.2%
P95
Net-to-Gross24.6%23.2%27.1%34.6%
P41
Occupancy57.0%42.8%55.7%67.0%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.8M$429K$1.6M$2.0M
P66
Exp/Bed$1.2M$358K$1.4M$1.9M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML