Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF NOBLE CTY INC 2026-04-26 15:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF NOBLE CTY INC
CCN 150146 | IN | 31 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$3.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$71.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$3.8M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $3.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$869K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$46K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$39K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$219K$650K$869K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$46K$46K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$357K$714K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$354K$707K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$290K$580K$869K$869K$869K$869K$869K
Clean Claim Rate$0$23K$46K$46K$46K$46K$46K$46K
Cumulative$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x95% / 28.5x100% / 32.0x104% / 35.5x106% / 37.3x108% / 39.0x
9.0x90% / 24.9x95% / 28.1x99% / 31.2x101% / 32.8x103% / 34.3x
10.0x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.9x94% / 27.8x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.6x
11.0x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.4x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.2x94% / 27.5x
12.0x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.2x87% / 22.6x88% / 23.8x90% / 24.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.5x
Headroom (turns)
69%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 69% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.0x, adding 6.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M1.7%
Year 1$1.2M+$2.5M$3.7M5.2%
Year 2$1.3M+$3.8M$5.0M7.0%
Year 3$1.3M+$3.8M$5.1M7.1%
Year 4$1.3M+$3.8M$5.1M7.1%
Year 5$1.4M+$3.8M$5.1M7.2%
$11.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$56.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$44.6M
Value Created
$5.1M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$37.6M
RCM Value Creation
$5.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$714K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$707K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$435K$652K$869K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$23K$34K$46K$55K
Total$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.7%-16.3%-5.2%6.3%
P67
Net-to-Gross27.4%29.0%33.0%47.9%
P19
Occupancy45.2%26.3%40.0%58.8%
P57
Rev/Bed$2.3M$548K$1.4M$2.0M
P80
Exp/Bed$2.3M$485K$1.5M$2.3M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML