Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KOSCIUSKO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KOSCIUSKO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 150133 | IN | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $44.3M → Pro Forma $52.1M (+$7.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$148.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$44.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$52.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$7.8M
Modeled Uplift
$5.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.2M (vs $7.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$95K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.8M$81K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$454K$1.3M$1.8M$5.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$95K$95K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$740K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$732K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$600K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$47K$95K$95K$95K$95K$95K$95K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
10.0x35% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$44.3M$44.3M29.9%
Year 1$45.6M+$5.2M$50.8M34.3%
Year 2$47.0M+$7.8M$54.8M37.0%
Year 3$48.4M+$7.8M$56.2M38.0%
Year 4$49.8M+$7.8M$57.6M38.9%
Year 5$51.3M+$7.8M$59.1M39.9%
$442.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$650.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$207.5M
Value Created
$59.1M
Exit EBITDA
$70.5M
Organic Growth
$77.8M
RCM Value Creation
$59.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$900K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$47K$71K$95K$114K
Total$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$9.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 76 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin29.9%-11.2%1.4%16.8%
P92
Net-to-Gross16.8%25.6%31.3%38.0%
P3
Occupancy42.1%39.4%52.9%66.7%
P28
Rev/Bed$2.1M$398K$1.1M$2.0M
P77
Exp/Bed$1.4M$364K$1.2M$1.9M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML