Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SOUTH 2026-04-26 06:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SOUTH
CCN 150128 | IN | 169 beds | Current EBITDA $45.5M → Pro Forma $62.1M (+$16.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$315.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$45.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$62.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$16.6M
Modeled Uplift
$11.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.7M (vs $16.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$202K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.3M$6.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$174K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$969K$2.9M$3.8M$12.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$202K$202K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$101K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K
Cumulative$0$4.5M$9.0M$13.5M$16.6M$16.6M$16.6M$16.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
10.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$45.5M$45.5M14.4%
Year 1$46.9M+$11.1M$57.9M18.3%
Year 2$48.3M+$16.6M$64.9M20.5%
Year 3$49.7M+$16.6M$66.3M21.0%
Year 4$51.2M+$16.6M$67.8M21.5%
Year 5$52.7M+$16.6M$69.4M22.0%
$455.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$762.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$307.9M
Value Created
$69.4M
Exit EBITDA
$72.5M
Organic Growth
$166.1M
RCM Value Creation
$69.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$101K$152K$202K$242K
Total$8.3M$12.5M$16.6M$19.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.4%-12.5%3.8%14.3%
P74
Net-to-Gross28.3%22.5%27.1%31.6%
P54
Occupancy65.4%48.4%60.7%68.5%
P59
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.2M$1.7M$2.1M
P70
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.3M$1.6M$2.0M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML