Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSP & HEALTH CARE CTR 2026-04-26 04:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSP & HEALTH CARE CTR
CCN 150115 | IN | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $74.3M → Pro Forma $87.9M (+$13.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$259.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$74.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$87.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$13.6M
Modeled Uplift
$8.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.9M (vs $13.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$166K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.2M$5.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.0M$142K$5.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$795K$2.4M$3.2M$9.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$166K$166K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$83K$166K$166K$166K$166K$166K$166K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.4M$11.1M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$74.3M$74.3M28.7%
Year 1$76.5M+$9.1M$85.6M33.0%
Year 2$78.8M+$13.6M$92.4M35.7%
Year 3$81.2M+$13.6M$94.8M36.6%
Year 4$83.6M+$13.6M$97.2M37.5%
Year 5$86.1M+$13.6M$99.7M38.5%
$742.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.10B
Exit EV (11x)
$354.4M
Value Created
$99.7M
Exit EBITDA
$118.3M
Organic Growth
$136.3M
RCM Value Creation
$99.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$83K$124K$166K$199K
Total$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$16.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.7%-11.2%4.3%14.5%
P90
Net-to-Gross31.8%24.0%29.4%35.3%
P62
Occupancy31.8%43.2%54.5%66.5%
P11
Rev/Bed$2.7M$404K$1.4M$2.0M
P90
Exp/Bed$1.9M$331K$1.3M$1.9M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML