Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN HEALTH LAFAYETTE 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN HEALTH LAFAYETTE
CCN 150109 | IN | 177 beds | Current EBITDA $10.2M → Pro Forma $30.0M (+$19.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$377.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$30.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$19.9M
Modeled Uplift
$14.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.2M (vs $19.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$242K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.6M$7.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.3M$208K$7.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.4M$4.6M$14.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$242K$242K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$121K$242K$242K$242K$242K$242K$242K
Cumulative$0$5.4M$10.8M$16.1M$19.9M$19.9M$19.9M$19.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x81% / 19.5x86% / 22.0x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.8x93% / 27.1x
9.0x76% / 17.0x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.5x87% / 22.6x88% / 23.7x
10.0x72% / 14.9x76% / 17.0x80% / 19.0x82% / 20.0x84% / 21.0x
11.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x
12.0x64% / 11.9x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.2M$10.2M2.7%
Year 1$10.5M+$13.2M$23.7M6.3%
Year 2$10.8M+$19.9M$30.7M8.1%
Year 3$11.1M+$19.9M$31.0M8.2%
Year 4$11.5M+$19.9M$31.3M8.3%
Year 5$11.8M+$19.9M$31.7M8.4%
$101.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$348.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$246.6M
Value Created
$31.7M
Exit EBITDA
$16.2M
Organic Growth
$198.7M
RCM Value Creation
$31.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$121K$181K$242K$290K
Total$9.9M$14.9M$19.9M$23.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-11.7%4.1%14.2%
P44
Net-to-Gross23.2%22.9%27.1%31.4%
P27
Occupancy66.4%47.8%60.7%68.6%
P65
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
P75
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$1.6M$1.9M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML