Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 11:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 150091 | IN | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $142K → Pro Forma $3.8M (+$3.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$69.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$142K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$843K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$44K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$213K$630K$843K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$44K$44K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$346K$693K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$343K$686K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$281K$562K$843K$843K$843K$843K$843K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K
Cumulative$0$992K$2.0M$3.0M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x187% / 193.2x193% / 215.1x198% / 236.9x201% / 247.8x204% / 258.7x
9.0x180% / 171.4x186% / 190.8x191% / 210.2x194% / 219.9x197% / 229.6x
10.0x174% / 153.9x180% / 171.4x185% / 188.9x188% / 197.6x190% / 206.3x
11.0x169% / 139.7x174% / 155.5x180% / 171.4x182% / 179.3x185% / 187.3x
12.0x164% / 127.7x170% / 142.3x175% / 156.8x177% / 164.1x180% / 171.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.2x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.3x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$142K$142K0.2%
Year 1$146K+$2.4M$2.6M3.7%
Year 2$150K+$3.6M$3.8M5.5%
Year 3$155K+$3.6M$3.8M5.5%
Year 4$160K+$3.6M$3.8M5.5%
Year 5$164K+$3.6M$3.8M5.5%
$1.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$41.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$40.5M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$226K
Organic Growth
$36.4M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$693K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$686K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$421K$632K$843K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$22K$33K$44K$53K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-11.9%-2.9%7.0%
P59
Net-to-Gross27.3%28.5%32.0%38.9%
P20
Occupancy36.4%24.7%39.2%59.4%
P47
Rev/Bed$1.9M$433K$1.3M$2.0M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.9M$430K$1.3M$2.0M
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML