Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 150089 | IN | 316 beds | Current EBITDA $4.5M → Pro Forma $32.1M (+$27.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$524.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$32.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$27.6M
Modeled Uplift
$19.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.5M (vs $27.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$336K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.5M$10.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.1M$289K$10.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.4M$20.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$336K$336K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$168K$336K$336K$336K$336K$336K$336K
Cumulative$0$7.5M$15.0M$22.4M$27.6M$27.6M$27.6M$27.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x119% / 50.3x124% / 56.3x128% / 62.2x131% / 65.2x133% / 68.2x
9.0x114% / 44.4x118% / 49.7x123% / 55.0x125% / 57.6x127% / 60.2x
10.0x109% / 39.6x114% / 44.4x118% / 49.1x120% / 51.5x122% / 53.9x
11.0x104% / 35.7x109% / 40.0x114% / 44.4x116% / 46.5x118% / 48.7x
12.0x101% / 32.5x105% / 36.4x110% / 40.4x112% / 42.4x114% / 44.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.3x
Headroom (turns)
82%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 82% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.2x, adding 7.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.5M$4.5M0.9%
Year 1$4.6M+$18.4M$23.0M4.4%
Year 2$4.8M+$27.6M$32.4M6.2%
Year 3$4.9M+$27.6M$32.5M6.2%
Year 4$5.0M+$27.6M$32.7M6.2%
Year 5$5.2M+$27.6M$32.8M6.2%
$44.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$360.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$316.1M
Value Created
$32.8M
Exit EBITDA
$7.1M
Organic Growth
$276.1M
RCM Value Creation
$32.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.5M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Clean Claim Rate$168K$252K$336K$403K
Total$13.8M$20.7M$27.6M$33.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%-2.5%3.8%10.1%
P39
Net-to-Gross21.7%22.1%25.1%30.1%
P21
Occupancy71.7%60.8%68.9%72.9%
P64
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.5M$1.7M$2.1M
P43
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.4M$1.6M$2.0M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML