Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENT ANDERSON 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENT ANDERSON
CCN 150088 | IN | 144 beds | Current EBITDA $9.5M → Pro Forma $19.8M (+$10.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$194.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$10.2M
Modeled Uplift
$6.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.8M (vs $10.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$124K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.9M$3.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.7M$107K$3.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$597K$1.8M$2.4M$7.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$124K$124K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$972K$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$963K$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$789K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$62K$124K$124K$124K$124K$124K$124K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.3M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
9.0x62% / 11.2x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
10.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x
11.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
12.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.4x
Headroom (turns)
37%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 37% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.1x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.5M$9.5M4.9%
Year 1$9.8M+$6.8M$16.7M8.6%
Year 2$10.1M+$10.2M$20.4M10.5%
Year 3$10.4M+$10.2M$20.7M10.6%
Year 4$10.7M+$10.2M$21.0M10.8%
Year 5$11.1M+$10.2M$21.3M11.0%
$95.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$234.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$138.8M
Value Created
$21.3M
Exit EBITDA
$15.2M
Organic Growth
$102.3M
RCM Value Creation
$21.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$62K$93K$124K$149K
Total$5.1M$7.7M$10.2M$12.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.9%-7.7%6.9%18.5%
P44
Net-to-Gross27.1%23.6%27.7%34.9%
P46
Occupancy46.9%46.5%57.1%67.4%
P25
Rev/Bed$1.4M$726K$1.6M$2.1M
P31
Exp/Bed$1.3M$638K$1.5M$1.9M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML