Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL LOGANSPORT 2026-04-26 09:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL LOGANSPORT
CCN 150072 | IN | 37 beds | Current EBITDA $-18.0M → Pro Forma $-12.6M (+$5.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$103.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-18.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-12.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$5.4M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$66K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$57K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$318K$943K$1.3M$4.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$66K$66K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$518K$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$513K$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$420K$840K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$33K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-18.0M$-18.0M-17.4%
Year 1$-18.6M+$3.6M$-15.0M-14.4%
Year 2$-19.1M+$5.4M$-13.7M-13.2%
Year 3$-19.7M+$5.4M$-14.3M-13.8%
Year 4$-20.3M+$5.4M$-14.9M-14.3%
Year 5$-20.9M+$5.4M$-15.5M-14.9%
$-180.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-170.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.3M
Value Created
$-15.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-28.7M
Organic Growth
$54.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-15.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$630K$945K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$33K$50K$66K$80K
Total$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.4%-12.2%-2.9%7.4%
P15
Net-to-Gross35.8%28.3%32.3%39.6%
P66
Occupancy39.2%25.2%41.5%61.1%
P48
Rev/Bed$2.8M$430K$1.3M$2.0M
P83
Exp/Bed$3.3M$430K$1.3M$2.0M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML