Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF SOUTH BEND INC 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF SOUTH BEND INC
CCN 150058 | IN | 429 beds | Current EBITDA $61.4M → Pro Forma $94.7M (+$33.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$631.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$61.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$33.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$94.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$24.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$33.2M
Modeled Uplift
$22.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $22.6M (vs $33.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$404K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$33.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.6M$12.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.2M$347K$12.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.7M$7.7M$24.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$404K$404K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.2M$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.1M$6.3M$9.4M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$202K$404K$404K$404K$404K$404K$404K
Cumulative$0$9.0M$18.1M$26.9M$33.2M$33.2M$33.2M$33.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $33.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
9.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
10.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
11.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
12.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$61.4M$61.4M9.7%
Year 1$63.3M+$22.1M$85.4M13.5%
Year 2$65.2M+$33.2M$98.4M15.6%
Year 3$67.1M+$33.2M$100.3M15.9%
Year 4$69.1M+$33.2M$102.4M16.2%
Year 5$71.2M+$33.2M$104.4M16.5%
$614.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.15B
Exit EV (11x)
$534.5M
Value Created
$104.4M
Exit EBITDA
$97.8M
Organic Growth
$332.2M
RCM Value Creation
$104.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$15.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.3M$9.4M$12.5M$15.0M
A/R Days Reduction$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$9.2M
Clean Claim Rate$202K$303K$404K$485K
Total$16.6M$24.9M$33.2M$39.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.7%-6.6%0.9%6.0%
P76
Net-to-Gross31.9%24.3%27.1%30.5%
P88
Occupancy68.8%61.0%70.4%72.8%
P41
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.5M$1.7M$2.1M
P12
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.5M$1.7M$2.2M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML