Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN HEALTH MOORESVILLE 2026-04-26 09:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN HEALTH MOORESVILLE
CCN 150057 | IN | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $41.2M → Pro Forma $49.4M (+$8.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$157.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$41.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$49.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$8.3M
Modeled Uplift
$5.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.3M (vs $8.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$101K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.1M$3.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.0M$86K$3.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$483K$1.4M$1.9M$6.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$101K$101K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$786K$1.6M$2.4M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$779K$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$638K$1.3M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$50K$101K$101K$101K$101K$101K$101K
Cumulative$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.7M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$41.2M$41.2M26.2%
Year 1$42.4M+$5.5M$47.9M30.5%
Year 2$43.7M+$8.3M$51.9M33.0%
Year 3$45.0M+$8.3M$53.3M33.9%
Year 4$46.3M+$8.3M$54.6M34.7%
Year 5$47.7M+$8.3M$56.0M35.6%
$411.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$615.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$204.3M
Value Created
$56.0M
Exit EBITDA
$65.6M
Organic Growth
$82.7M
RCM Value Creation
$56.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.4M$3.1M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$957K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$50K$75K$101K$121K
Total$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$9.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 72 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.2%-11.4%1.3%14.9%
P90
Net-to-Gross24.6%24.7%30.9%49.9%
P23
Occupancy27.6%42.3%54.0%66.7%
P10
Rev/Bed$2.0M$379K$1.0M$1.9M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.5M$358K$1.1M$1.7M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML