Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH 2026-04-26 02:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH
CCN 150056 | IN | 1269 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.37B → Pro Forma $-1.19B (+$188.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.58B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.37B
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$188.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.19B
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$137.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$188.2M
Modeled Uplift
$119.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$69.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $119.0M (vs $188.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$71.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$70.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$43.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$2.3M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$188.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$71.5M$71.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$68.9M$2.0M$70.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$11.0M$32.6M$43.5M$137.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$17.9M$35.8M$53.7M$71.5M$71.5M$71.5M$71.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$17.7M$35.4M$53.1M$70.8M$70.8M$70.8M$70.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$14.5M$29.0M$43.5M$43.5M$43.5M$43.5M$43.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$1.1M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Cumulative$0$51.3M$102.5M$152.6M$188.2M$188.2M$188.2M$188.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $188.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.37B$-1.37B-38.4%
Year 1$-1.42B+$125.5M$-1.29B-36.1%
Year 2$-1.46B+$188.2M$-1.27B-35.5%
Year 3$-1.50B+$188.2M$-1.31B-36.7%
Year 4$-1.55B+$188.2M$-1.36B-38.0%
Year 5$-1.59B+$188.2M$-1.41B-39.3%
$-13.75B
Entry EV (10x)
$-15.46B
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.71B
Value Created
$-1.41B
Exit EBITDA
$-2.19B
Organic Growth
$1.88B
RCM Value Creation
$-1.41B
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$35.8M$53.7M$71.5M$85.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$35.4M$53.1M$70.8M$85.0M
A/R Days Reduction$21.8M$32.6M$43.5M$52.2M
Clean Claim Rate$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Total$94.1M$141.2M$188.2M$225.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 153 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-38.4%-16.0%-5.0%4.1%
P7
Net-to-Gross29.5%21.6%27.0%31.3%
P64
Occupancy74.7%71.4%79.4%88.2%
P34
Rev/Bed$2.8M$1.6M$2.1M$2.8M
P75
Exp/Bed$3.9M$1.6M$2.2M$3.3M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML