Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TERRE HAUTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TERRE HAUTE REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 150046 | IN | 141 beds | Current EBITDA $16.2M → Pro Forma $22.1M (+$5.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$112.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$5.9M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$72K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$62K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$345K$1.0M$1.4M$4.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$72K$72K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$562K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$556K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$456K$911K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K$72K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.8x57% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.2M$16.2M14.5%
Year 1$16.7M+$3.9M$20.7M18.4%
Year 2$17.2M+$5.9M$23.1M20.6%
Year 3$17.7M+$5.9M$23.6M21.1%
Year 4$18.3M+$5.9M$24.2M21.5%
Year 5$18.8M+$5.9M$24.7M22.0%
$162.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$272.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$109.7M
Value Created
$24.7M
Exit EBITDA
$25.9M
Organic Growth
$59.1M
RCM Value Creation
$24.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$683K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$54K$72K$86K
Total$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.5%-7.7%6.9%18.5%
P69
Net-to-Gross13.8%23.6%27.7%34.9%
P6
Occupancy32.0%46.5%57.1%67.4%
P8
Rev/Bed$797K$726K$1.6M$2.1M
P25
Exp/Bed$682K$638K$1.5M$1.9M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML