Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
CCN 150042 | IN | 99 beds | Current EBITDA $-30.2M → Pro Forma $-17.9M (+$12.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$233.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-30.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-17.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$12.3M
Modeled Uplift
$8.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.3M (vs $12.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$149K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.7M$4.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.5M$128K$4.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$715K$2.1M$2.8M$8.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$149K$149K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$945K$1.9M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$75K$149K$149K$149K$149K$149K$149K
Cumulative$0$3.3M$6.7M$9.9M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-30.2M$-30.2M-12.9%
Year 1$-31.1M+$8.2M$-22.9M-9.8%
Year 2$-32.0M+$12.3M$-19.7M-8.5%
Year 3$-33.0M+$12.3M$-20.7M-8.9%
Year 4$-33.9M+$12.3M$-21.7M-9.3%
Year 5$-35.0M+$12.3M$-22.7M-9.7%
$-301.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-249.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$51.9M
Value Created
$-22.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-48.0M
Organic Growth
$122.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-22.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$75K$112K$149K$179K
Total$6.1M$9.2M$12.3M$14.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.9%-11.4%4.3%15.3%
P22
Net-to-Gross34.7%23.8%28.3%35.0%
P73
Occupancy43.9%42.8%54.5%66.4%
P27
Rev/Bed$2.4M$420K$1.5M$2.0M
P85
Exp/Bed$2.7M$358K$1.3M$1.9M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML