Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 06:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER INC.
CCN 150034 | IN | 180 beds | Current EBITDA $30.4M → Pro Forma $47.2M (+$16.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$319.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$30.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$47.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$16.8M
Modeled Uplift
$11.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.5M (vs $16.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$204K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.4M$6.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$176K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$979K$2.9M$3.9M$12.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$204K$204K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$102K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.1M$13.6M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.4x
9.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.3x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
11.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
12.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$30.4M$30.4M9.5%
Year 1$31.3M+$11.2M$42.5M13.3%
Year 2$32.2M+$16.8M$49.0M15.4%
Year 3$33.2M+$16.8M$50.0M15.7%
Year 4$34.2M+$16.8M$51.0M16.0%
Year 5$35.2M+$16.8M$52.0M16.3%
$304.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$572.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$268.4M
Value Created
$52.0M
Exit EBITDA
$48.4M
Organic Growth
$167.9M
RCM Value Creation
$52.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$102K$153K$204K$245K
Total$8.4M$12.6M$16.8M$20.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.5%-11.7%4.1%14.2%
P65
Net-to-Gross24.5%22.9%27.1%31.4%
P35
Occupancy55.8%47.8%60.7%68.6%
P40
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
P60
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.3M$1.6M$1.9M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML