Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ESKENAZI HEALTH 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ESKENAZI HEALTH
CCN 150024 | IN | 314 beds | Current EBITDA $-335.7M → Pro Forma $-306.1M (+$29.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$562.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-335.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$29.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-306.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$29.6M
Modeled Uplift
$21.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.0M (vs $29.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$360K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$29.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.2M$11.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.8M$309K$11.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.1M$6.8M$21.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$360K$360K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M$11.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$180K$360K$360K$360K$360K$360K$360K
Cumulative$0$8.1M$16.1M$24.0M$29.6M$29.6M$29.6M$29.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $29.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-335.7M$-335.7M-59.7%
Year 1$-345.8M+$19.7M$-326.0M-58.0%
Year 2$-356.1M+$29.6M$-326.5M-58.1%
Year 3$-366.8M+$29.6M$-337.2M-60.0%
Year 4$-377.8M+$29.6M$-348.2M-61.9%
Year 5$-389.1M+$29.6M$-359.6M-63.9%
$-3.36B
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.96B
Exit EV (11x)
$-598.4M
Value Created
$-359.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-534.7M
Organic Growth
$295.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-359.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.6M$8.4M$11.2M$13.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.6M$8.4M$11.1M$13.4M
A/R Days Reduction$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.2M
Clean Claim Rate$180K$270K$360K$432K
Total$14.8M$22.2M$29.6M$35.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-2.5%3.8%10.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross21.3%22.1%25.1%30.1%
P18
Occupancy73.2%60.8%68.9%72.9%
P79
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.5M$1.7M$2.1M
P57
Exp/Bed$2.9M$1.4M$1.6M$2.0M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML