Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ELKHART GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ELKHART GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 150018 | IN | 201 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.1M → Pro Forma $13.9M (+$17.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$323.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$17.0M
Modeled Uplift
$11.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.9M (vs $17.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$207K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.5M$6.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.2M$178K$6.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$991K$2.9M$3.9M$12.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$207K$207K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$103K$207K$207K$207K$207K$207K$207K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.3M$13.8M$17.0M$17.0M$17.0M$17.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.4x
Headroom (turns)
129%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 129% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.9x, adding 100.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.1M$-3.1M-1.0%
Year 1$-3.2M+$11.3M$8.1M2.5%
Year 2$-3.3M+$17.0M$13.7M4.2%
Year 3$-3.4M+$17.0M$13.6M4.2%
Year 4$-3.5M+$17.0M$13.5M4.2%
Year 5$-3.6M+$17.0M$13.4M4.1%
$-31.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$147.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$178.4M
Value Created
$13.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.9M
Organic Growth
$169.9M
RCM Value Creation
$13.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.5M$7.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$103K$155K$207K$248K
Total$8.5M$12.7M$17.0M$20.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.0%-12.1%3.8%12.1%
P34
Net-to-Gross28.6%22.2%26.0%29.6%
P64
Occupancy67.1%49.1%61.0%70.4%
P64
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.4M$1.7M$2.1M
P36
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.3M$1.6M$2.0M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML