Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN HEALTH MICHIGAN CITY 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN HEALTH MICHIGAN CITY
CCN 150015 | IN | 119 beds | Current EBITDA $17.0M → Pro Forma $31.5M (+$14.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$276.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$14.6M
Modeled Uplift
$10.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.5M (vs $14.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$177K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.5M$5.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.3M$152K$5.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$849K$2.5M$3.4M$10.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$177K$177K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$89K$177K$177K$177K$177K$177K$177K
Cumulative$0$4.0M$7.9M$11.8M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.2x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x
9.0x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x
10.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
11.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
12.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.0M$17.0M6.1%
Year 1$17.5M+$9.7M$27.2M9.8%
Year 2$18.0M+$14.6M$32.6M11.8%
Year 3$18.5M+$14.6M$33.1M12.0%
Year 4$19.1M+$14.6M$33.6M12.2%
Year 5$19.7M+$14.6M$34.2M12.4%
$169.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$376.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$206.8M
Value Created
$34.2M
Exit EBITDA
$27.0M
Organic Growth
$145.6M
RCM Value Creation
$34.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.8M$4.2M$5.5M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$89K$133K$177K$213K
Total$7.3M$10.9M$14.6M$17.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.1%-9.3%6.2%18.2%
P47
Net-to-Gross24.7%23.1%27.1%35.3%
P42
Occupancy65.7%45.2%57.0%67.1%
P67
Rev/Bed$2.3M$474K$1.6M$2.0M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.2M$433K$1.4M$1.8M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML