Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAPORTE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAPORTE HOSPITAL
CCN 150006 | IN | 74 beds | Current EBITDA $37.0M → Pro Forma $47.2M (+$10.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$192.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$47.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$10.1M
Modeled Uplift
$7.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.6M (vs $10.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$123K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.7M$106K$3.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$590K$1.8M$2.3M$7.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$123K$123K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$962K$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$952K$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$780K$1.6M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$62K$123K$123K$123K$123K$123K$123K
Cumulative$0$2.8M$5.5M$8.2M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.0M$37.0M19.3%
Year 1$38.1M+$6.7M$44.9M23.3%
Year 2$39.3M+$10.1M$49.4M25.7%
Year 3$40.5M+$10.1M$50.6M26.3%
Year 4$41.7M+$10.1M$51.8M26.9%
Year 5$42.9M+$10.1M$53.1M27.6%
$370.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$583.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$213.2M
Value Created
$53.1M
Exit EBITDA
$59.0M
Organic Growth
$101.2M
RCM Value Creation
$53.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$62K$92K$123K$148K
Total$5.1M$7.6M$10.1M$12.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.3%-11.2%2.8%18.5%
P75
Net-to-Gross24.0%25.2%31.4%41.4%
P17
Occupancy77.1%39.4%52.4%65.7%
P85
Rev/Bed$2.6M$399K$1.2M$2.0M
P83
Exp/Bed$2.1M$365K$1.2M$1.9M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML