Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 04:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HENDRICKS REGIONAL HEALTH
CCN 150005 | IN | 130 beds | Current EBITDA $-15.2M → Pro Forma $7.1M (+$22.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$423.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-15.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$22.3M
Modeled Uplift
$15.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.4M (vs $22.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$271K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.5M$8.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.1M$233K$8.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.9M$5.2M$16.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$271K$271K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$135K$271K$271K$271K$271K$271K$271K
Cumulative$0$6.1M$12.1M$18.1M$22.3M$22.3M$22.3M$22.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-18.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
24.7x
Headroom (turns)
380%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 380% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -18.2x, adding 117.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-15.2M$-15.2M-3.6%
Year 1$-15.7M+$14.8M$-819K-0.2%
Year 2$-16.1M+$22.3M$6.1M1.4%
Year 3$-16.6M+$22.3M$5.7M1.3%
Year 4$-17.1M+$22.3M$5.2M1.2%
Year 5$-17.6M+$22.3M$4.6M1.1%
$-152.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$51.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$203.1M
Value Created
$4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-24.2M
Organic Growth
$222.7M
RCM Value Creation
$4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$10.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
Clean Claim Rate$135K$203K$271K$325K
Total$11.1M$16.7M$22.3M$26.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.6%-8.3%6.2%17.7%
P31
Net-to-Gross35.3%23.8%27.7%34.7%
P76
Occupancy49.4%45.6%57.1%68.0%
P30
Rev/Bed$3.3M$583K$1.6M$2.0M
P98
Exp/Bed$3.4M$551K$1.5M$1.9M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML