Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN HEALTH HAMMOND 2026-04-26 08:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRANCISCAN HEALTH HAMMOND
CCN 150004 | IN | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.1M → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$6.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$117.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$6.2M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $6.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$75K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$65K$2.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$361K$1.1M$1.4M$4.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$75K$75K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$588K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$582K$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$477K$955K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$75K$75K$75K$75K$75K$75K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-37.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
44.2x
Headroom (turns)
681%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 681% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -37.7x, adding 136.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.1M$-5.1M-4.3%
Year 1$-5.2M+$4.1M$-1.1M-0.9%
Year 2$-5.4M+$6.2M$826K0.7%
Year 3$-5.5M+$6.2M$665K0.6%
Year 4$-5.7M+$6.2M$499K0.4%
Year 5$-5.9M+$6.2M$329K0.3%
$-50.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.2M
Value Created
$329K
Exit EBITDA
$-8.1M
Organic Growth
$61.9M
RCM Value Creation
$329K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$716K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$56K$75K$90K
Total$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$7.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.3%-50.0%-11.2%0.4%
P63
Net-to-Gross26.6%28.3%51.5%60.9%
P16
Occupancy23.0%27.8%33.7%49.8%
P10
Rev/Bed$11.8M$1.2M$1.6M$2.8M
P95
Exp/Bed$12.3M$1.6M$2.2M$3.5M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML