Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALEXIAN BROTHERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 14:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALEXIAN BROTHERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 144031 | IL | 141 beds | Current EBITDA $-18.6M → Pro Forma $-14.3M (+$4.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$82.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-18.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-14.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$4.3M
Modeled Uplift
$3.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.1M (vs $4.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$53K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$45K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$253K$749K$1.0M$3.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$53K$53K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$412K$824K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$408K$815K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$334K$668K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$53K$53K$53K$53K$53K$53K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.5M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-18.6M$-18.6M-22.6%
Year 1$-19.1M+$2.9M$-16.3M-19.7%
Year 2$-19.7M+$4.3M$-15.4M-18.7%
Year 3$-20.3M+$4.3M$-16.0M-19.4%
Year 4$-20.9M+$4.3M$-16.6M-20.1%
Year 5$-21.5M+$4.3M$-17.2M-20.9%
$-185.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-189.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.5M
Value Created
$-17.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-29.6M
Organic Growth
$43.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-17.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$824K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$815K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$501K$752K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$40K$53K$63K
Total$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.6%-18.9%-7.5%4.2%
P19
Net-to-Gross39.9%21.2%25.2%33.1%
P85
Occupancy76.4%41.9%54.5%69.1%
P85
Rev/Bed$584K$666K$1.1M$1.6M
P23
Exp/Bed$716K$653K$1.2M$1.7M
P26

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML