Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIVEREDGE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIVEREDGE HOSPITAL
CCN 144009 | IL | 210 beds | Current EBITDA $11.9M → Pro Forma $14.5M (+$2.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$936K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$976K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$966K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$594K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$976K$976K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$939K$27K$966K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$150K$444K$594K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$244K$488K$732K$976K$976K$976K$976K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$242K$483K$725K$966K$966K$966K$966K
A/R Days Reduction$0$198K$396K$594K$594K$594K$594K$594K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$699K$1.4M$2.1M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.9M$11.9M24.4%
Year 1$12.2M+$1.7M$14.0M28.6%
Year 2$12.6M+$2.6M$15.2M31.1%
Year 3$13.0M+$2.6M$15.6M31.9%
Year 4$13.4M+$2.6M$16.0M32.7%
Year 5$13.8M+$2.6M$16.4M33.5%
$118.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$179.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$61.0M
Value Created
$16.4M
Exit EBITDA
$18.9M
Organic Growth
$25.7M
RCM Value Creation
$16.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$488K$732K$976K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$483K$725K$966K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$297K$445K$594K$712K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.4%-20.8%-8.7%0.9%
P97
Net-to-Gross67.3%20.8%25.2%32.5%
P96
Occupancy51.9%46.0%58.6%71.4%
P33
Rev/Bed$232K$666K$1.2M$1.6M
P2
Exp/Bed$176K$738K$1.2M$1.7M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML