Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LARABIDA CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LARABIDA CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CCN 143301 | IL | 39 beds | Current EBITDA $2.4M → Pro Forma $4.1M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$387K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$612K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$606K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$373K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$612K$612K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$589K$17K$606K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$94K$279K$373K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$153K$306K$459K$612K$612K$612K$612K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$152K$303K$455K$606K$606K$606K$606K
A/R Days Reduction$0$124K$248K$373K$373K$373K$373K$373K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$439K$877K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.4M$2.4M8.0%
Year 1$2.5M+$1.1M$3.6M11.7%
Year 2$2.6M+$1.6M$4.2M13.7%
Year 3$2.7M+$1.6M$4.3M14.0%
Year 4$2.8M+$1.6M$4.4M14.3%
Year 5$2.8M+$1.6M$4.5M14.5%
$24.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$49.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.5M
Value Created
$4.5M
Exit EBITDA
$3.9M
Organic Growth
$16.1M
RCM Value Creation
$4.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$306K$459K$612K$735K
Denial Rate Reductio$303K$455K$606K$728K
A/R Days Reduction$186K$279K$373K$447K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$805K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 76 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-9.2%-3.3%7.3%
P0
Net-to-Gross29.7%32.7%41.9%50.4%
P18
Occupancy89.6%19.4%28.8%42.3%
P99
Rev/Bed$785K$906K$1.4M$1.9M
P19
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.5M$1.9M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML