Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION INST 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION INST
CCN 143031 | IL | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.9M → Pro Forma $-2.2M (+$774K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$774K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$564K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$774K
Modeled Uplift
$489K
Risk-Adjusted
-$285K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$294K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$291K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$179K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$774K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$294K$294K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$283K$8K$291K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$45K$134K$179K$564K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$74K$147K$221K$294K$294K$294K$294K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$73K$146K$218K$291K$291K$291K$291K
A/R Days Reduction$0$60K$119K$179K$179K$179K$179K$179K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$211K$421K$627K$774K$774K$774K$774K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $774K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.9M$-2.9M-19.9%
Year 1$-3.0M+$516K$-2.5M-17.0%
Year 2$-3.1M+$774K$-2.3M-15.9%
Year 3$-3.2M+$774K$-2.4M-16.5%
Year 4$-3.3M+$774K$-2.5M-17.2%
Year 5$-3.4M+$774K$-2.6M-17.8%
$-29.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-28.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$446K
Value Created
$-2.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.7M
Organic Growth
$7.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$147K$221K$294K$353K
Denial Rate Reductio$146K$218K$291K$349K
A/R Days Reduction$89K$134K$179K$215K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$387K$580K$774K$928K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-19.9%-18.5%-6.6%9.1%
P23
Net-to-Gross57.0%23.4%30.4%40.1%
P90
Occupancy34.9%32.6%42.5%56.1%
P36
Rev/Bed$245K$722K$1.2M$1.8M
P4
Exp/Bed$294K$618K$1.2M$1.9M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML