Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF SOUT 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF SOUT
CCN 143030 | IL | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.0M → Pro Forma $-135K (+$881K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$881K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-135K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$642K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$881K
Modeled Uplift
$609K
Risk-Adjusted
-$272K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$335K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$332K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$204K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$881K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$335K$335K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$322K$9K$332K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$51K$152K$204K$642K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$84K$167K$251K$335K$335K$335K$335K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$83K$166K$249K$332K$332K$332K$332K
A/R Days Reduction$0$68K$136K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$240K$480K$714K$881K$881K$881K$881K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $881K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.0M$-1.0M-6.1%
Year 1$-1.0M+$587K$-459K-2.7%
Year 2$-1.1M+$881K$-197K-1.2%
Year 3$-1.1M+$881K$-229K-1.4%
Year 4$-1.1M+$881K$-263K-1.6%
Year 5$-1.2M+$881K$-297K-1.8%
$-10.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.9M
Value Created
$-297K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.6M
Organic Growth
$8.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-297K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$167K$251K$335K$402K
Denial Rate Reductio$166K$249K$332K$398K
A/R Days Reduction$102K$153K$204K$244K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$440K$661K$881K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 77 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.1%-9.2%-3.3%8.1%
P36
Net-to-Gross56.5%32.9%41.9%50.8%
P84
Occupancy61.8%19.5%29.1%42.5%
P86
Rev/Bed$419K$890K$1.4M$1.9M
P8
Exp/Bed$444K$1.1M$1.5M$1.9M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML