Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
CCN 141350 | IL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $10.7M → Pro Forma $13.9M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$61.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$750K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$189K$561K$750K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$308K$616K$924K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$305K$610K$915K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$250K$500K$750K$750K$750K$750K$750K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$883K$1.8M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.7M$10.7M17.4%
Year 1$11.0M+$2.2M$13.2M21.4%
Year 2$11.3M+$3.2M$14.6M23.7%
Year 3$11.7M+$3.2M$14.9M24.2%
Year 4$12.0M+$3.2M$15.3M24.8%
Year 5$12.4M+$3.2M$15.6M25.4%
$106.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$172.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$65.1M
Value Created
$15.6M
Exit EBITDA
$17.0M
Organic Growth
$32.4M
RCM Value Creation
$15.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$616K$924K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$610K$915K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$375K$562K$750K$900K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$39K$47K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.4%-7.4%-1.9%5.7%
P90
Net-to-Gross34.7%33.4%42.5%48.7%
P27
Occupancy39.4%17.4%26.2%40.8%
P73
Rev/Bed$2.5M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P88
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML