Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARLINVILLE AREA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARLINVILLE AREA HOSPITAL
CCN 141347 | IL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $577K → Pro Forma $2.9M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$44.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$577K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$826K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$891K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$882K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$542K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$891K$891K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$858K$25K$882K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$137K$406K$542K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$223K$446K$668K$891K$891K$891K$891K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$221K$441K$662K$882K$882K$882K$882K
A/R Days Reduction$0$181K$362K$542K$542K$542K$542K$542K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$638K$1.3M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x104% / 35.0x108% / 39.2x113% / 43.4x115% / 45.5x117% / 47.7x
9.0x98% / 30.7x103% / 34.5x107% / 38.2x109% / 40.1x111% / 42.0x
10.0x94% / 27.3x98% / 30.7x103% / 34.1x105% / 35.8x106% / 37.5x
11.0x90% / 24.5x94% / 27.6x98% / 30.7x100% / 32.2x102% / 33.8x
12.0x86% / 22.2x90% / 25.0x95% / 27.9x96% / 29.3x98% / 30.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.8x
Headroom (turns)
74%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 74% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.7x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$577K$577K1.3%
Year 1$594K+$1.6M$2.2M4.8%
Year 2$612K+$2.3M$3.0M6.6%
Year 3$630K+$2.3M$3.0M6.7%
Year 4$649K+$2.3M$3.0M6.7%
Year 5$669K+$2.3M$3.0M6.8%
$5.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.4M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$919K
Organic Growth
$23.4M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$446K$668K$891K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$441K$662K$882K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$271K$407K$542K$651K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$29K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-7.4%-1.9%5.7%
P60
Net-to-Gross47.8%33.4%42.5%48.7%
P71
Occupancy30.3%17.4%26.2%40.8%
P60
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML