Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SALEM TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SALEM TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL
CCN 141345 | IL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $9.9M → Pro Forma $12.4M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$887K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$967K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$957K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$588K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$967K$967K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$930K$27K$957K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$148K$440K$588K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$242K$483K$725K$967K$967K$967K$967K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$239K$478K$718K$957K$957K$957K$957K
A/R Days Reduction$0$196K$392K$588K$588K$588K$588K$588K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$692K$1.4M$2.1M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.9M$9.9M20.5%
Year 1$10.2M+$1.7M$11.9M24.6%
Year 2$10.5M+$2.5M$13.0M27.0%
Year 3$10.8M+$2.5M$13.4M27.6%
Year 4$11.1M+$2.5M$13.7M28.3%
Year 5$11.5M+$2.5M$14.0M29.0%
$98.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$154.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$55.2M
Value Created
$14.0M
Exit EBITDA
$15.8M
Organic Growth
$25.4M
RCM Value Creation
$14.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$483K$725K$967K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$478K$718K$957K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$294K$441K$588K$706K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.5%-7.4%-1.9%5.7%
P93
Net-to-Gross30.4%33.4%42.5%48.7%
P15
Occupancy26.8%17.4%26.2%40.8%
P51
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML