Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OSF SAINT CLARE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OSF SAINT CLARE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 141337 | IL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $791K → Pro Forma $3.0M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$791K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$854K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$840K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$832K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$511K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$840K$840K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$808K$23K$832K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$129K$382K$511K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$210K$420K$630K$840K$840K$840K$840K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$208K$416K$624K$832K$832K$832K$832K
A/R Days Reduction$0$170K$341K$511K$511K$511K$511K$511K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$602K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x91% / 25.7x96% / 28.9x100% / 32.1x102% / 33.7x104% / 35.3x
9.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.2x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.0x
10.0x82% / 19.9x86% / 22.4x90% / 25.0x92% / 26.3x94% / 27.6x
11.0x78% / 17.8x82% / 20.1x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.8x
12.0x74% / 16.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.3x85% / 21.4x86% / 22.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$791K$791K1.9%
Year 1$814K+$1.5M$2.3M5.4%
Year 2$839K+$2.2M$3.0M7.3%
Year 3$864K+$2.2M$3.1M7.3%
Year 4$890K+$2.2M$3.1M7.4%
Year 5$916K+$2.2M$3.1M7.4%
$7.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$34.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.5M
Value Created
$3.1M
Exit EBITDA
$1.3M
Organic Growth
$22.1M
RCM Value Creation
$3.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$420K$630K$840K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$416K$624K$832K$998K
A/R Days Reduction$256K$383K$511K$613K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$27K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-7.4%-1.9%5.7%
P62
Net-to-Gross41.9%33.4%42.5%48.7%
P47
Occupancy15.5%17.4%26.2%40.8%
P16
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML