Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT JOSEPH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT JOSEPH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 141334 | IL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $29.1M → Pro Forma $33.6M (+$4.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$86.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$29.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$33.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$55K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$264K$783K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$55K$55K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$430K$860K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$426K$852K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$349K$698K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$29.1M$29.1M33.9%
Year 1$30.0M+$3.0M$33.0M38.4%
Year 2$30.9M+$4.5M$35.4M41.2%
Year 3$31.8M+$4.5M$36.3M42.3%
Year 4$32.8M+$4.5M$37.3M43.4%
Year 5$33.8M+$4.5M$38.3M44.5%
$291.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$421.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$129.9M
Value Created
$38.3M
Exit EBITDA
$46.4M
Organic Growth
$45.2M
RCM Value Creation
$38.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$860K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$852K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$523K$785K$1.0M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$41K$55K$66K
Total$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin33.9%-7.4%-1.9%5.7%
P99
Net-to-Gross32.2%33.4%42.5%48.7%
P19
Occupancy44.7%17.4%26.2%40.8%
P80
Rev/Bed$3.4M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P95
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML