Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HILLSBORO AREA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HILLSBORO AREA HOSPITAL
CCN 141332 | IL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $226K → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$226K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$690K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$676K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$669K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$411K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$676K$676K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$650K$19K$669K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$307K$411K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$169K$338K$507K$676K$676K$676K$676K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$167K$334K$502K$669K$669K$669K$669K
A/R Days Reduction$0$137K$274K$411K$411K$411K$411K$411K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$484K$968K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x129% / 62.6x134% / 70.0x139% / 77.3x141% / 80.9x143% / 84.6x
9.0x123% / 55.3x128% / 61.8x133% / 68.3x135% / 71.6x137% / 74.8x
10.0x118% / 49.5x123% / 55.3x128% / 61.2x130% / 64.1x132% / 67.0x
11.0x114% / 44.7x119% / 50.0x123% / 55.3x125% / 58.0x127% / 60.6x
12.0x110% / 40.7x115% / 45.6x119% / 50.4x121% / 52.9x123% / 55.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.5x
Headroom (turns)
85%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 85% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.0x, adding 7.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$226K$226K0.7%
Year 1$233K+$1.2M$1.4M4.2%
Year 2$240K+$1.8M$2.0M6.0%
Year 3$247K+$1.8M$2.0M6.0%
Year 4$255K+$1.8M$2.0M6.0%
Year 5$262K+$1.8M$2.0M6.0%
$2.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$22.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.2M
Value Created
$2.0M
Exit EBITDA
$360K
Organic Growth
$17.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$338K$507K$676K$811K
Denial Rate Reductio$334K$502K$669K$803K
A/R Days Reduction$206K$308K$411K$493K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$888K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-7.4%-1.9%5.7%
P59
Net-to-Gross49.3%33.4%42.5%48.7%
P77
Occupancy16.8%17.4%26.2%40.8%
P21
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P40
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML