Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAMMOND-HENRY HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 06:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAMMOND-HENRY HOSPITAL
CCN 141319 | IL | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $1.5M → Pro Forma $4.4M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 141319

HAMMOND-HENRY HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$54.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$663K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$167K$496K$663K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$272K$545K$817K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$270K$540K$809K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$221K$442K$663K$663K$663K$663K$663K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$781K$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 18.9x85% / 21.4x89% / 23.9x91% / 25.1x92% / 26.3x
9.0x75% / 16.5x80% / 18.7x84% / 20.9x85% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x
10.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
11.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x
12.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.5M$1.5M2.8%
Year 1$1.6M+$1.9M$3.5M6.4%
Year 2$1.6M+$2.9M$4.5M8.2%
Year 3$1.7M+$2.9M$4.5M8.3%
Year 4$1.7M+$2.9M$4.6M8.4%
Year 5$1.8M+$2.9M$4.6M8.5%
$15.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$51.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.7M
Value Created
$4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$2.4M
Organic Growth
$28.7M
RCM Value Creation
$4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$545K$817K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$540K$809K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$332K$497K$663K$796K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 71 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-6.7%-1.3%7.8%
P65
Net-to-Gross43.8%35.1%43.2%48.9%
P52
Occupancy20.6%17.4%26.0%40.8%
P32
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.1M$1.5M$2.1M
P81
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML