Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MENDOTA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MENDOTA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 141310 | IL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $4.1M → Pro Forma $5.9M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$665K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$702K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$695K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$427K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$702K$702K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$675K$19K$695K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$108K$319K$427K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$175K$351K$526K$702K$702K$702K$702K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$174K$347K$521K$695K$695K$695K$695K
A/R Days Reduction$0$142K$285K$427K$427K$427K$427K$427K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$503K$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.1M$4.1M11.6%
Year 1$4.2M+$1.2M$5.4M15.5%
Year 2$4.3M+$1.8M$6.2M17.6%
Year 3$4.5M+$1.8M$6.3M17.9%
Year 4$4.6M+$1.8M$6.4M18.3%
Year 5$4.7M+$1.8M$6.6M18.7%
$40.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$72.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.5M
Value Created
$6.6M
Exit EBITDA
$6.5M
Organic Growth
$18.5M
RCM Value Creation
$6.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$351K$526K$702K$842K
Denial Rate Reductio$347K$521K$695K$833K
A/R Days Reduction$213K$320K$427K$512K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$22K$27K
Total$923K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.6%-7.4%-1.9%5.7%
P79
Net-to-Gross39.4%33.4%42.5%48.7%
P41
Occupancy28.0%17.4%26.2%40.8%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.5M$2.0M
P44
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML