Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WASHINGTON COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WASHINGTON COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 141308 | IL | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $389K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$862K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$389K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$862K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$628K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$862K
Modeled Uplift
$554K
Risk-Adjusted
-$307K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$328K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$324K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$199K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$862K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$328K$328K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$315K$9K$324K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$50K$149K$199K$628K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$82K$164K$246K$328K$328K$328K$328K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$81K$162K$243K$324K$324K$324K$324K
A/R Days Reduction$0$66K$133K$199K$199K$199K$199K$199K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$235K$469K$699K$862K$862K$862K$862K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $862K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x85% / 21.4x89% / 24.2x93% / 26.9x95% / 28.3x97% / 29.6x
9.0x80% / 18.7x84% / 21.1x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.8x92% / 26.0x
10.0x75% / 16.5x80% / 18.7x84% / 20.9x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x
11.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x
12.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.9x
Headroom (turns)
59%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 59% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.6x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$389K$389K2.4%
Year 1$401K+$574K$975K6.0%
Year 2$413K+$862K$1.3M7.8%
Year 3$425K+$862K$1.3M7.9%
Year 4$438K+$862K$1.3M7.9%
Year 5$451K+$862K$1.3M8.0%
$3.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.5M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$620K
Organic Growth
$8.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$164K$246K$328K$393K
Denial Rate Reductio$162K$243K$324K$389K
A/R Days Reduction$100K$149K$199K$239K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$13K
Total$431K$646K$862K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 68 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.4%-6.7%-1.2%7.3%
P64
Net-to-Gross58.2%35.1%43.7%49.2%
P91
Occupancy43.4%17.4%26.1%42.3%
P78
Rev/Bed$744K$1.1M$1.5M$2.2M
P9
Exp/Bed$727K$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML